Q)
R and (P
(Q
R)) are
logically equivalent.Click here for answer.
Click here for answer.
(
x)(P(x)
Q(x))
((
x)P(x)
(
x)Q(x))
Click here for answer.
2 + 22 + 23 + ... + 2n = 2n+1 - 2.
Click here for answer.
Click here for the answer.
(A - B)
(B - A) = (A
B) - (A
B)
Click here for answer.
Click here for answer.
| P | Q | R | P Q | (P Q) R | Q R | P (Q R) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T | T | T | T | T | T | T |
| T | T | F | T | F | F | F |
| T | F | T | F | T | T | T |
| T | F | F | F | T | T | T |
| F | T | T | F | T | T | T |
| F | T | F | F | T | F | T |
| F | F | T | F | T | T | T |
| F | F | F | F | T | T | T |
Return to questions
Let S = "turtles can sing", A = "artichokes can fly" and D = "dogs can play chess". The given statements can now be written symbolically as:
A,
(S
~D),
S.
(S
~D). But, since S and D are logically equivalent, this means that S
(D
~D), which is a contradiction. Since a true statement cannot imply a contradiction, we must have that S is false, i.e., ~S is true - turtles can not sing.Return to questions

Return to questions
Let A be the set of all natural numbers for which the statement is true.
The statement, with n = 1, is 2 = 22 - 2. As the RHS evalutes to 2, the statement is true in this case, and so, 1 is in A. Now, assume that the statement is true for the integer m, and consider n = m + 1. We have:
21 + 22 + 23 + ... + 2m + 2m+1 =
2m+1 - 2 + 2m+1 = 2(2m+1) - 2 = 2m+2 -2, showing that
the statement is true for n = m + 1. Thus, A is an inductive set and by PMI the statement is true for all n.
Return to questions

Return to questions
x
(A - B)
(B - A)
((x
A)
(x
B))
((x
B)
(x
A))
(((x
A)
(x
B))
(x
B))
(((x
A)
(x
B))
(x
A))
(((x
A)
(x
B))
((x
B)
(x
B)))
(((x
A)
(x
A))
((x
B)
(x
A)))
(((x
A)
(x
B))
((x
B)
(x
A)))
(x
A
B)
(x
B
A)
x
(A
B) - (B
A)
Return to questions
See returned Special Assignment #1.
Return to questions