Next: About this document ...
Math 2411-Notes for February 3, 2004
Integration by Partial Fractions:
Before we start on the new material, consider the following three formulas
for antiderivatives:
In each of the above formulas we assume that
is some function of
and
is the derivative of
with respect to
. In formula
(3) we assume that
(since this would then be formula (1)).
A couple of examples will be instructive.
First,
This is an example of formula (1). Formula (1) tells us that if
the numerator is the derivative of the denominator then the
antiderivtaive is the natural logarithm of the denomimator. Since the
derivative of the denominator
is the numerator,
we fit this formula.
The next example is
Here we have used formula (2) where
and
and so
. Some of you might be
tempted to give the solution using formula (1). But the derivative of
the denominator is
, and the numerator is not the
derivative of the denominator. Formula (1) does not help. We should
consider one more example of this
``form.''
Again it is tempting to write the solution using formula (1). But the
derivative of the denominator is
which does not
match the numerator. So we see if it fits formula (2). We would have
, and
. Then since
we can rewrite the integral as
So the solution is
Now for an example of formula (3).
To see that this follows formula (3) notice that we can rewrite the
integral as
Here
and we use the power rule of formula (3).
* Notice that we used the familiar technique
-substitution in all three of these formulas. In other words, we
were simply seeing if these inetgrals fit one of the patterns in these
formulas. Lets reiterate the important ideas in each formula:
When integrating a rational function (a fraction)
and the numerator is the derivative of the denominator our solution
will involve the natural logarithm of the denominator.
If the denominator is some function raised to a power
(besides 1) and the numerator is the
derivative of the inside piece of the denominator, then we use the
power rule in formula (3).
If the denominator is the sum of a constant and some
function of
, and the numerator is the derivative
of the square root of that function of
, then we use
the formula (2).
Now that we see how these formulas work we should ask how to deal with
rational functions that do not match any of the patterns in these
three formulas we just visited. Consider
We should first notice that formula (1) does not work since the
derivative of the denominator
does not
match the numerator. The denominator is not some polynomial raised to
an exponent power and is clearly not some constant added to a function
squared. If we use our calculators we arrive at the solution
If we take derivatives of both sides we should arrive at some identity
equation for the integrand.
It appears that to solve this problem we need to break the initial
fraction into a number of simpler pieces. The technique that we use
to rewrite a fraction as the sum of a number of simpler fractions is
called partial fractions.
To perform a partial fraction decomposition of a rational function we
follow a number of easy steps. Lets follow the steps with using our
current example.
- Completely factor the denominator into irreducible factors.
Recall that every polynomial can be factored into a product of linear
and irreducible quadratic factors. (A quadratic factor is
irreduceable if it has no real roots, or zeros.)
- Each factor of the denominator will give us a piece of the
decomposition, where the numerator over a quadratic factor is an
arbitary linear function, and the numerator of a piece corresponding
to a linear factor will be an arbitrary constant.
- We are now ready to solve for the constants in the numerators.
We do this by first combining all the new ``pieces'' into a single fraction
which has a denominator that matches the original denominator.
- Now that we have completed the recombination notice that we have
two equal fractions, both having the same denominator. So their
numerators must also match.
It follows (by matching the coefficients of these polynomials) that
This is now a system of 3 linear equations with three variables. We
get
 |
 |
 |
(1) |
 |
 |
 |
(2) |
 |
 |
 |
(3) |
 |
 |
 |
(4) |
| |
 |
 |
(5) |
 |
 |
 |
(6) |
| |
 |
 |
(7) |
 |
 |
 |
(8) |
 |
 |
 |
(9) |
Now we substitute these variables and integrate to get
Its time to go back to the formulas from the begining of the notes.
The second integral is easiest since the numerator is the derivative
of the denominator; i.e., let
and then
and we rewrite
the integral as
Hence
What about the next piece. Check that we don't fit into any of the
three formulas. Furthermore, we can not perform partial fractions
again because the denominator can not be factored. We might seem to
be stuck, but don't forget that one can always use basic algebra and
break up the numerator.
Now the first piece is solved using
-substitution and letting
. Then
and the numerator is (a scalar multiple
of) the derivative of the denominator and we use formula (1). The
second piece fits into formula (2) with
and
. So we get
Combining all the information we get
which is exactly the solution we found with technology.
Lets write out the basic formula ued in the initial decomposition in
step 2 above.
Notice that the general formula accounts for repeated roots which did
not appear in our example. As an example study
The only tricky part of this example is noticing that
is a
repeated linear factor because it has real roots; i.e.,
can still be factored into
which is the same as
which is a repated linear factor that has the
root zero.
Of course it would be a nightmare to determine all the constants
by hand, but this examples illustrates well the
genral technique in step 2.
Next: About this document ...
Robert Rostermundt
2004-01-31