Next: About this document ...
Up: Generalized Quadrangles over the
Previous: Properties of Coset Geoemtry
We now want to consider the subgroups Aj contained in our family
.
Define
and
and
,
where
ft(a) is an additive function. It can be shown that
,satisfying P3, if and only if
,
where ft(a) is an additive
function. So it needs to be shown what types of
function are additive. The next theorem shows that there is only one
type of additive function.
Theorem: Let
be the Galois field, GF(q)where q=pe. Then if
is an additive
function, then
f(b)=b+a1bp+a2bp2+...+ae-1bpe-1
for any
.
proof:
Let
.
Let
.
Then
and
.
For
,
define f to be the additive
function such that
f(b)=a0b+a1bp+...+ae-1bpe-1
Because f is additive, if f(b)=0 for all
,
then
a0=a1=...=ae-1=0. Thus,
are linearly independent and form
a basis. Therefore we can construct qe distinct additive functions
of this type. It is left to show that these are all the possible
additive functions.
Think of
as a vector space of dimension e over
and let
be the additive group of all linear operators on
.
What is the dimension of
?
The dimension of all operators
is the
dimension of the set of all
matrices. Here n=e and so
the dimension=e2. Therefore, we have
pe2=p(e)e=qe and the
dimension of
.
But
this was the number of additive functions of the type
f(b)=a0b+a1bp+...+ae-1bpe-1
Therefore this are the only possible additive functions.
Q.E.D.
Corollary: Let
be the galois field of
order 9=32 and let
be the family of all additive
functions over
.
Then
Result follows from above theorem.
We can use this result to discover the possible additive functions
satisfying equation (*).
Consider the galois field
.
Extend this field to
the factor ring over the ideal generated by the irreducible polynomial
x2+1. The result is
Because all multiples of x2+1 are absorbed into the ideal we can
think of x2+1 as being congruent to 0. Therefore x2=-1. Now we
can create the multiplicative group from the primitive element
.
The group is
.
We now want to see what each subgroup in the four-gonal family looks
like, in particular what each A-t looks like. Once we have a
possible At, we can check that
.
Remember that the subgroup At in the fourgonal family looks like
In order to satisfy equation (*), we need that
.
Suppose that
f1(a)=a+(x+1)a3. Then
But
(-x-1)2=-x and
.
So immediately we might have noticed that
.
Even without this observation when
constructing the group A1 the first element we find is
(x+1,0,x+1) which is an element of
,
and so
nontrivially. Therefore, the additive function
f1(b)=b+(x+1)b3
does not satisfy equation (*).
Now look at an additive function that satisfies (*). Let
f1(a)=a+(x-1)a3. After some calculations we arrive at the following.
Using this information we can now construct a subgroup A1using this additive function. Remember that because
we get the following
Calculations involving the nine possibilities for f1(a) tell us
that there are only three choices satisfying equation (*),
with corresponding subgroups
The next step to show that the only GQ over GF(9) is the classical
example is to find all possible additive functions f2(a) that
satisfy properties
P1,...,P5. From the work Laurel has done with her
mathematica program, we expect to eliminate all possible additive
functions after checking the possibilities for the additive function f2(a).
Hopefully, after proving the conjecture through elimination we will
find the intuition to give a mathematical proof which is not dependent
on these calculations. That is the goal of this project.
Next: About this document ...
Up: Generalized Quadrangles over the
Previous: Properties of Coset Geoemtry
2001-05-10