Next: Minimal Polynomials
Up: BCH Codes
Previous: Linear and Cyclic Codes
  Contents
Lemma 1
Let

be fields, and let
![$ f(x),g(x)\in k[x]\subset
\mathbb{K}[x]$](img111.png)
. Then the

computed in
![$ \mathbb{K}[x]$](img113.png)
is the same as the

computed in
![$ k[x]$](img114.png)
.
The proof of the lemma follows directly from the division
algorithm.
Proof.
In
![$ \mathbb{K}[x]$](img113.png)
we can write
where
![$ Q(x), R(x)\in\mathbb{K}[x]$](img116.png)
and deg

deg

. Since
both
![$ f(x), g(x)\in k[x]$](img119.png)
we can also write
where
![$ q(x), r(x)\in k[x]$](img121.png)
and deg

deg

. But the
equation

also holds in
![$ \mathbb{K}[x]$](img113.png)
because

. Then the uniqueness of

and

in
![$ \mathbb{K}[x]$](img113.png)
ensures that

and

.
So the lists occuring in the Euclidean algorithm will be indentical in
both fields and thus
![$ (f,g)\in\mathbb{K}[x]=(f,g)\in k[x]$](img128.png)
.
So when working with the gcd of two polynomial functions in a
polynomial ring over a field
, we can work
in either the base field
or a polynomial ring over a field
extension
. In particular, we may wish to extend
to a
splitting field for some polnomial in
.
Lemma 2
Let
![$ f(x)=\prod(x-a_i)\in\ensuremath{\mathbb{F}}[x]$](img130.png)
, where

is a field and

for all

. Then

has no repeated roots iff the

, where

is the derivative of

.
Proof.
Assume that

has a repeated root
and show that

and

are not relatively prime. If

has a repeated root then
Then using the product rule for derivatives we get
But then

divides both

and

and the

.
Assume that

and show that

is not equal to the product

,
where

and
![$ h(x)\in\ensuremath{\mathbb{F}}[x]$](img143.png)
.
By assumption, if

then

. We can write

for

and
![$ g(x)\in\ensuremath{\mathbb{F}}[x]$](img147.png)
and it follows that

. But then

implies that

and thus

for some
![$ h(x)\in\ensuremath{\mathbb{F}}[x]$](img143.png)
. Therefore,
and the proof is complete.
Given the previous two lemmas we get the following theorem.
Theorem 4
Let

be a polynomial in
![$ \ensuremath{\mathbb{F}}[x]$](img49.png)
. Then

has no repeated
roots iff the

.
The next corrolarry follows.
Corollary 1
Let

be a positive integer and let

be a field. If the
characterisitic of

is either 0 or is a prime not dividing

,
then

has exactly

distinct roots in a splitting field.
Proof.
If

then

which is not equal to zero since

does not divide n. Thus

and

has no repeated roots. Since every polynomial has a splitting field,
there must be some extension

such that

and

has

distinct roots in

.
For example, consider the field
which has
characteristic 2. Then for any odd integer
we can find a
field extension
such that
for some
.
Recall that a field
with
elements has an
root of unity
iff
. So let
and let
be the smallest integer
such that
and
. Then
.
To create the extension, find an irreducible polynomial
of
degree
over
and then form the field
. Because 2 does not divide 5, then
. Also, since
was chosen correctly we have
which is the order of
and there will be a unique
cyclic subgroup
of order 5 such that for all
we have
. These are the fifth roots of unity in the
extension that we were looking for. And because there must be a
primitive element in every cyclic group, one of the roots
is
a primitive root of unity. Thus
for all
.
Next: Minimal Polynomials
Up: BCH Codes
Previous: Linear and Cyclic Codes
  Contents
2002-03-30